Crowborough
Training Camp.
Wealden
District Council was informed on October 10th 2025 that the Home Office intended to use the
Crowborough Training Camp (which is an MOD site and thus “Crown Land”) for the
purpose of asylum seeker accommodation.
A letter was sent to Mike Tapp, the current Minister for Migration and
Citizenship on October 22nd. Interestingly, this is a
example of the chaotic and inefficient way Wealden has approached this debacle; the
Council Leader Councillor Partridge wrote to the wrong minister. The
appropriate minister would have been Alex Norris who is the Minister of State
for Border Security and Asylum. It’s no wonder it was ineffective – they
wrote to the wrong person.
The tone of the letter appears to focus on service provision, the
letter says:
“We are therefore writing to set out our concerns, confirm our understanding
of the proposals, and to ensure that we and all local partners are fully
consulted as plans emerge”
“
We” referred to in this letter related to Wealden District Council. However, at
this point, no communication had been made to the wider elected membership of
Wealden; not to the opposition at least. It is important to note that Wealden
is run by an Administration comprising Green Party, Liberal Democrats and
Labour. No communication was made outside this group. The letter seems more
concerned with procedure and there is little evidence (if anything at all) of any
effort to object or challenge the Home Office intention. The letter ends with:
“We
recognise that the Home Office is not seeking our permission to use the Camp
for this purpose, but we are keen to work with you to ensure your plans are as
effective as possible and the impact on the community is carefully managed. We
welcomed the opportunity for our officers to meet with your operational teams
and hope this partnership working can continue.”
On
Tuesday October 28th and news broke in the
press that Crowborough Army Camp was intended to be used to house 600 migrants.
Wealden Councillors were invited to an “urgent” meeting that morning where the
Leadership of Wealden informed those who were on the call about what they had been told eighteen days
earlier. 18 days of no communication with the wider member body – people
elected to look after your interests and make representations on your behalf.
It emerged that day that Nusrat Ghani, the MP for Sussex Weald had also been
kept in the dark about the intended use of the camp. A camp within walking
distance to the centre of one of the largest towns in the constituency. Along
with the public, she was rightly angry and looking for answers. That same day, Wealden put up a website with some further
information; information they had in their possession for 18 days.
On
Wednesday 29th October an urgent question
was raised on the floor of the House of Commons regarding the use of
Crowborough Training Camp along with Cameron Barracks in Inverness to house
asylum seekers. Thankfully, the Home Office sent the correct Minister to answer
those questions. Contributions were made from 2 MP’s in Sussex, Mims Davies
(Uckfield and East Grinsted) and Kieren Mullen (Bexhill and Battle). Nus Ghani,
as Deputy Speaker is prohibited from engaging in debates on the floor.
Nusrat
Ghani released information on Friday evening that she had been informed by the
Home Office that Wealden would be given money - over £1000 - for each asylum
seeker in the camp. However, there is no requirement for this money which feels
like a bribe to be spent in the local community.
What
should Wealden do?
In
every single case where large concentrations of asylum seekers have been
proposed, it is the Local District or Borough Council that has fought on behalf
of residents. There is complexity as the Home Office is attempting to use Crown
Powers under the General Permitted Development Order 2015. Does this mean that
nothing can be done? Not in my view. “Not my fault gov” is buck passing.
There are potential avenues that we need to explore as a community. At this
point, I am not aware they have mounted any form of credible challenge. Wealden
needs to outline the avenues they have explored and potentially discounted. I
would also like to see strong representations made about the open camp policy.
“If” the camp is used – occupants should be confined to the camp unable to
wander the streets of Crowborough and Wealden. It needs to be a closed
facility. I don’t see a political will to challenge the use of the Camp. This is
just not good enough.
Why have the Leadership not objected with force?
As
I stated above, the Leadership comprises Green Party, Liberal Democrat and
Labour Councillors. The Green Party are the dominant force within the Alliance,
ideologically driven and their stated policies are not conducive to objecting
to the camp’s use. Indeed, the UK would be flooded with migrants if they were
ever to gain more than the handful of MP’s they have. I believe Rachel
Millward, being the Deputy Leader of the National Green Party of England and
Wales is conflicted.
Their policy book includes the following:
·
The
Green Party wants to see a world without borders, until this happens the Green
Party will implement a fair and humane system of managed immigration where
people can move if they wish to do so.
·
The
Green Party believes that migration is not a criminal offence under any
circumstances (i.e. there is no distinction between legal and illegal
migration).
·
The
Green Party is opposed to forced migration and forced repatriation unless
standard exclusions apply.
·
The
Green Party seeks to establish a system that recognises that all migrants are
treated as citizens in waiting and therefore supports and encourages them to
put down roots in their new home.
·
Undocumented
migrants will be given free advice and support to help them to regularise their
status without penalty for being undocumented.
Is
this formal policy list compatible with
a willingness to challenge the Home
Office desire to use the camp in Crowborough for one of the largest
concentrations of illegal male entrants to the UK and all of the potential
issues that brings for Crowborough and more widely, Wealden and the UK ?I think
it’s madness.
More recently, the wider Green Group at East Sussex County Council attempted to
“designate East Sussex as a County of Sanctuary” for migrants – even suggesting
the County Council sign up to an organisation called the “Migrant Champions network” – an organisation that
advocates against data sharing with the Home Office. The Green Party attempt
was rightly voted down.
So
in summary:
WDC have been aware of the government position since October 10th
·
The
Wealden Alliance briefed their own councillors significantly in advance of
opposition councillors.
·
These
councillors kept in the dark while Green
& Lib Dem Crowborough Councillors were briefed
·
There
is no evidence that key cabinet members have visited the site
·
They’ve
attempted to pass the buck claiming no agency in this process when they are
clearly the lead stakeholder and the planning authority (It’s their
District!!!)
·
WDC
have as far as we are aware taken no external legal advice
·
WDC
have known about government funds according to the Home Office and not shared
this with their councillors or the public
·
WDC’s
very limited communications have been lame and the letters were sent to the
wrong Minister
·
Their
pre-occupations seem to subordinate the welfare of local people to that of the
illegal migrants (clearly there is a balance to be found here)
·
An
apparent ideological predisposition to accommodating large numbers of asylum
seekers in the community
WDC
has not reached for or considered any of the tools used by other District
Councils put in a similar position:
Judicial
Review
Stop
Order
Request
for lower camp numbers
Request
for a closed as opposed to an open processing facility
Raised
concerns related to illegal migrants absconding
Made
specific and material demands to support the welfare of our impacted community
What the Council needs to do now is work together for the best outcome for our
residents. With our M.P.s and the County Council we need to stop this madness.
Wealden
Council Spending a lot of your money.
Wealden
Council are currently spending millions of your money on a range of pet projects. Some of these are
quite good for local communities, some pander to Green Party objectives and
some have been called bribes for voters.
Wealden
was for many years well run by the Conservatives who built up reserves to be
spent on future infrastructure projects. Wealden are now wasting some of that.
We could all have had a Council Tax cut which would have benefitted everyone
and our local economy.
A
reminder on Waste.
From
November 24th, residents will need to book a time slot for a visit
to a household waste site. You can do a HWRS booking on the East Sussex
website,
This
is a policy with which I strongly disagree but my views were not accepted.
Roy
Galley
November
4th 2025.
Roy Galley.cllr.roy.galley@eastsussex.gov.uk
01825 713018